The importance of authenticity in cultural tourism Essay

The importance of legitimacy in ethnic tourism - Essay ExampleThe danger posed by pagan tourism is that civilisation may be lost. This is because the refining of the tourists and the finis of the natives may become intermingled, and there is no genuineness left. harmonize to the view of those who coin the term hyper-reality, the result is that the distinction between inauthenticity and authenticity are collapsed. Therefore, authenticity is lost, and re define concord to a new paradigm that includes the mixing of tourist culture. This is obviously detrimental to the native populations, whose culture and rituals stimulate been passed down from one generation to the next, and have a profound interest in keeping their culture alive.Another danger is that native people may be exploited through inauthentic heathen shows. A good example of this is the Maasai people who were on display at a Kenyan bed covering owned by a wet Briton. The Maasai people put on a show for the wealthy visitors, and lived in mud huts on the property. They were not allowed to interact, and they were treated as one might treat animals in the zoo strictly for display and entertainment. While the wealthy British people who viewed this spectacle politely clap, the Maasai are being stereotyped and humiliated. This is clearly the wrong mode to go about cultural tourism. On the other hand, synergistic experiences, where tourists immerse themselves in native culture, is authentic and allows natives to display their culture with pride. Other authentic displays of native rituals, such(prenominal) as the Balinese, who perform rituals not for the entertainment of the people but for the worship of their gods, is another good way for the natives to retain their culture while teaching tourists about the same. This paper will explore the theories behind cultural displays, why authenticity is important, what obstacles there are to authenticity, and will make a recommendation based on these find ings. A theoretical discussion of authenticity and culture in tourism Authenticity in culture tourism takes place on a variety of planes and is impacted by a variety of things. Wang et al. (1999) posits that authenticity in cultural tourism is complex. The reason for the complexity is because authenticity may be either defined as object, constructive or existential. Objective authenticity comes from the ability to judge authenticity in an objective manner. Therefore, even if the tourists feel that something is authentic, it may nevertheless be inauthentic if it is objectively judged to be so. Constructive authenticity, on the other hand, means that objects are judged to be authentic by shifting standards, according to power structures, points of view, beliefs or perspectives. Therefore, constructive authenticity cannot be objectively measured, as it is a relative standard, contextually determined and ever-evolving (Wang et al., 1999, p. 351). Moreover, cultural heritage may be poli ticized, in that heritage may defined or re-defined to serve issue needs. Such is the case in China, and this contributes to constructive authenticity as well (Sofield & Li, 1998, p. 364). The third way that authenticity is defined, according to Wang et al. (1999) is existentially. This means that the person feels self-actualized while viewing these cultural items, and, basically, the